Expert Picks From The First and Only Network in the Sports Handicapping Industry

Jim Hurley Sports and Racing Information Network
Jim Hurley Sports and Racing Information Network
Jim Hurley Sports and Racing Information Network
Jim Hurley Sports and Racing Information Network

Looking for expert picks or help handicapping? Jim Hurley has been a sports handicapper for 26 years and in that time has built a huge network of insiders. Jim uses a team-approach to picking winners. First, there's his number-crunchers in his home office who work in tandem with computer programmers to create the sharpest simulations in the industry. Add to this his huge network of on-the-scene insider sources around the country, providing him with vital intangible information that may not be reflected in the statistical probabilities, things like who's got a nagging injury, what teams have chemistry problems, what horses are set to be turned loose. Jim's got access to the sharpest minds in the Strip. It's the kind of comprehensive approach any sports handicapper would dream of, and Jim Hurley has been doing it since 1985.

You too can benefit from Jim's extensive network. Purchase one of his sports picks today, sign up for a daily free sports pick sent to your inbox, or get your free membership to this site.

Sports Betting Notebook : 3/29/2011

JIM HURLEY'S HANDICAPPING NOTEBOOK

THE FINAL FOUR GOES TONIGHT AT MADISON SQUARE GARDEN

The NCAA Tournament is off until Saturday, but we have a FINAL FOUR TONIGHT in the NIT!

Today we'll present expanded stat previews for the semifinals matching Wichita State/Washington State and Alabama/Colorado. We'll pick up the NIT again on Thursday for the championship game...updating our indicator stats and running the boxscore data from tonight's games. Wednesday we'll take a quick detour for Major League Baseball since the season starts on Thursday. The NBA will be back on our regular radar once March Madness is in the books.

So much to talk about! And there's a lot of great basketball going all week long,including the NBA. You can click here for a week of bankroll building and then the NCAA Final Four Saturday plus next Monday's championship game.

Tonight it's all about the NIT. Let's get to our expanded previews. As always, much of the data you're about to read comes from Ken Pomeroy's great college basketball site (kenpom.com).

WICHITA STATE vs. WASHINGTON STATE

Wichita St.: +10.9 margin average, 44% two-point defense
Washington St.: +0.4 margin average, 45% two-point defense
Conference Adjustment: Washington State 6 points
Vegas Line: Wichita State by 3, total of 143

Notebook: We're in the neighborhood of the Vegas line here...with Wichita State being +10.5 in margin average, but playing in a league that's six points worse according to computer projections. Arizona had a good showing for the Pac 10 in the Big Dance, and Washington sure didn't embarrass themselves in a close loss to North Carolina. Perhaps the differences are even greater than the math is suggesting, which puts us right on the Vegas spread.

Wichita State has the slightly better two-point defense before you factor in strength of schedule. Once you do, it's either a wash, or Washington State pulls slightly ahead.

ADJUSTED TEMPO
Wichita St.: 65.5 possessions per game
Washington St.: 68.6 possessions per game

The average is about 66 in college basketball. So, we have a fast underdog facing a favorite that prefers the halfcourt game. Clearly whoever imposes their style on proceedings will have an edge. Faster teams sometimes have an easier time of it in showcase games because there's so much energy in the arena. And, in this case, the teams have been off since last Wednesday. Can Wichita State stay in control with fresh legs with a New York buzz in the air?

THREE-POINT RELIANCE
Wichita St.: 29.0% of points on treys
Washington St.: 28.7% of points on treys

Only a fractional difference here. And, we are seeing a lot of trey-heavy teams keep winning this season. Butler and VCU were both over 30% for the season over in the NCAA's. That's usually a cut-off for NOT making it. The NIT has followed the more classic style this year, while the Big Dance has had some extreme three-point differentials both in style and in subsequent performance.

Let's see what happened the last time these teams were on the floor...

WICHITA STATE 82, COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON 75
Shooting Percentage: Charleston 48%, Wichita State 55%
Three-Pointers: Charleston 12/23, Wichita State 5/14
Free Throws: Charleston 7/11, Wichita State 19/21
Rebounds: Charleston 21, Wichita State 27
Turnovers: Charleston 15, Wichita State 12
Phantom Score: Charleston 53, Wichita State 75
Vegas Line: Wichita State by 8, total of 143

Notebook: Phantom Score is two-point scoring plus rebounds, which is a secondary score we use for context. Wichita State wins that in blowout fashion here. Charleston needed a big day from long range just to lose by seven points (a lucky underdog cover in that regard). Wichita State was solid in the paint based on that stellar 55% shooting percentage (which wasn't helped by a poor night from long range). This is a fairly impressive boxscore. But, it did come against a #6 seed that was playing its third road game in short order (Dayton, Cleveland, State, then Wichita State). The Shockers (Wichita State) lived up to their nickname when they took out #1 seed Virginia Tech in the second round.

WASHINGTON STATE 69, NORTHWESTERN 66 (in overtime)
Shooting Percentage: Northwestern 38%, Washington State 42%
Three-Pointers: Northwestern 10/38, Washington State 4/17
Free Throws: Northwestern 8/10, Washington State 15/22
Rebounds: Northwestern 35, Washington State 35
Turnovers: Northwestern 11, Washington State 8
Phantom Score: Northwestern 63, Washington State 77
Vegas Line: Washington State by 4, total of 146

Notebook: If you're going overtime at home to beat jet lagged Northwestern (who's prior game was at Boston College), then you can't be very proud. Washington State was more impressive in Phantom Score though thanks to their inside edges. Northwestern just launched treys all night hoping some would connect. Ugly game, with the two combining to go 14 of 55 from long range. You can see why the smart money hit Wichita State over Washington State when the lines went up. Anybody watching this game couldn't have been very impressed!

Our New York sources helped us out in Newark over the weekend (and with the Knicks on several recent occasions). Tonight they'll be all over these semifinal matchups. Has the line moved too much from pick-em to Wichita State by 3? Will Washington State have had time to get over its leg lag on the long West to East trip? If there's a big edge here, YOU'LL GET IT!

 

ALABAMA vs. COLORADO

Alabama: +5.4 margin average, 41% two-point defense
Colorado: -0.4 margin average, 49% two-point defense
Conference Adjustment: Colorado 2 points
Vegas Line: Alabama by 2, total of 142.5

Notebook:
The raw math says Alabama by 4. And, it's certainly possible that the SEC was closer to the Big 12 than was first realized given how the Big Dance has played out. Kansas was a disappointment once again. So was Texas. So was Kansas State. So was Texas A&M. You get the picture. Kentucky is in the Final Four, and Florida just missed. If the math is wrong above, it's wrong in a way that would make Alabama a bigger favorite.

You know we're big fans of two-point defense. Alabama already has a monster edge in that category! If the SEC is better than realized, the Tide will really dominate inside.

ADJUSTED TEMPO
Alabama: 65.0 possessions per game
Colorado: 68.2 possessions per game

Same story here as in the first game. Colorado will want to push tempo (which gives them a big edge at home at altitude but not so much at sea level). Alabama prefers a halfcourt game because it helps them make the most of that strong internal defense.

THREE-POINT RELIANCE
Alabama: 18.9% of points on treys
Colorado: 22.9% of points on treys

Wow...two teams who hate the three-pointer! Colorado pushes tempo to get fast breaks (similar in style to North Carolina for example, rather than the New York Knicks or Phoenix). Alabama is an extreme team in terms of working the ball inside to get as close as possible.

We have to say that's a tough matchup for Colorado. They rely heavily on deuces...and they're facing a 41% two-point defense. Colorado is awful at two-point defense, and is facing the most extreme two-point offense in the postseason. Colorado MUST create easy baskets off tempo to have a chance.

From last week's quarterfinals...

ALABAMA 79, MIAMI OF FLORIDA 64
Shooting Percentage: Miami 40%, Alabama 55%
Three-Pointers: Miami 2/15, Alabama 4/15
Free Throws: Miami 16/23, Alabama 15/24
Rebounds: Miami 33, Alabama 34
Turnovers: Miami 18, Alabama 14
Phantom Score: Miami 75, Alabama 76
Vegas Line: Alabama by 5.5, total of 130

Notebook: The differences in defense show up in shooting percentage. Alabama also did a very good job of forcing turnovers. They were kind of sloppy themselves though. And, they could have taken better advantage of their free throw opportunities. Alabama has the right stuff so to speak in terms of winning the tournament. But...it's still Alabama...they weren't good enough to make the Dance. They were in the weaker half of the SEC. They're far from a sure thing to execute when you need them too. This was a Phantom Score dead heat, with that great defense bailing Alabama out to a degree.


COLORADO 81, KENT STATE 74
Shooting Percentage: Kent State 50%, Colorado 49%
Three-Pointers: Kent State 6/18, Colorado 4/15
Free Throws: Kent State 8/11, Colorado 13/16
Rebounds: Kent State 26, Colorado 36
Turnovers: Kent State 9, Colorado 8
Phantom Score: Kent State 74, Colorado 92
Vegas Line: Colorado by 10.5, total of 153.5

Notebook: Obviously Colorado got killed inside if they allowed 50% shooting with only 33% success rate on treys for Kent. Colorado did own the battle of the boards, which is easier to do against a MAC team than an SEC team. And, Kent should have been exhausted playing at altitude after scoring upsets over St. Mary's (in California), and Fairfield (in Connecticut). Colorado was a double digit favorite and had to sweat the ending. The Buffaloes did make it to the Final Four, and want to send a message to the NCAA selection committee about getting snubbed. To this point, they haven't really impressed once you adjust for context.

This is another game that's already seen line movement off the opener. In both matchups, we'll have to make a determination about whether the line has moved enough, or two much. Our full TEAM HANDICAPPING approach has been studying these matchups since they were determined last Wednesday Night (which is plenty of time to find a BIG JUICY WINNER!). We WILL have a MAJOR RELEASE available for you online Tuesday afternoon.

All of our top plays can be purchased with your credit card here at the website. You can also sign up for the rest of basketball through the NBA playoffs and get remaining college tournament action included in your package. If you have any questions, call the office at 1-800-323-4453.

Back tomorrow to talk baseball. Make sure you're with us EVERY DAY in the NOTEBOOK so you know what's really happening in the world of sports!




Click here to send feedback
Jim Hurley's Handicapping Notebook
Archive Dates
  • May 2013
  • Apr 2013
  • Mar 2013
  • Feb 2013
  • Jan 2013
  • Dec 2012
  • Nov 2012
  • Oct 2012
  • Sep 2012
  • Aug 2012
  • Jul 2012
  • Jun 2012
  • May 2012
  • Apr 2012
  • Mar 2012
  • Feb 2012
  • Jan 2012
  • Articles for
    March, 2011
  • 3/31/2011 : NIT Championship Stat Preview ...
  • 3/30/2011 : MLB Starts Thursday ...
  • 3/29/2011 : NIT Final Four Previews ...
  • 3/28/2011 : Elite 8 Stat Summaries ...
  • 3/27/2011 : Sunday Elite 8 Stat Previews ...
  • 3/26/2011 : Saturday's Elite 8 Stat Previews ...
  • 3/25/2011 : Friday Sweet 16 Stat Previews ...
  • 3/24/2011 : Thursday Sweet 16 Stat Previews ...
  • 3/23/2011 : Wednesday NIT Previews ...
  • 3/22/2011 : Tuesday NIT Notes ...
  • 3/21/2011 : Monday NIT Stat Previews ...
  • 3/20/2011 : Sunday NCAA Stat Previews ...